Archive for the THE CONSIGLIERI Category

THE CONSERVATIVE NEWS: 132 1 LEVIATHAN 3 AS

Posted in CONSERVATIVE ANTI-INTELLECTUALISM, CONSERVATIVE BIGOTRY, CONSERVATIVE FEAR, CONSERVATIVE HEADS EXPLODING, CONSERVATIVE HYPOCRISY, CONSERVATIVE IGNORANCE, CONSERVATIVE INCITEMENT TO VIOLENCE, CONSERVATIVE LIES, CONSERVATIVE NEWS, THE CONSIGLIERI with tags , , on 27/02/2014 by consigliereciucava

Thoeressamt

Conservatives, suddenly, care about black babies, but only those that are in the womb.

ObamaCare navigators are terrorists.

To Conservatives, Liberals are perverts.

The far Right turns its wrath on former conservative superstar Jan Brewer.

Ciu Cava daelth Nixhot, J.F.. D.S.V.J.
Consiglieri
The Dis Brimstone Daily Pitchfork
132 1 Leviathan 3 AS

VOX POPULI: CONSERVATIVES TAKE AN END OF YEAR CHANCE TO VENT THEIR ANGER AND THREATEN PRESIDENT OBAMA AT BREITBART

Posted in BIGOTRY, BREITBART, CONSERVATIVE ANTI-INTELLECTUALISM, CONSERVATIVE BIGOTRY, CONSERVATIVE FEAR, CONSERVATIVE HYPOCRISY, CONSERVATIVE IGNORANCE, CONSERVATIVE INCITEMENT TO VIOLENCE, THE CONSIGLIERI, VULCA with tags , , , on 29/12/2013 by consigliereciucava

Thoeressamt

I must say my admiration of the President of the United States grows by the day. President Barack Obama, a true Human Being, is made of far more stern stuff than I. The vile comments, the unbridled hatred and the foul mouth bigotry that is spewed at him on the Internet every day would be enough to wear down any lesser being. Speaking only for myself and not for my entire species I know that I would crumble under just a few days of the pressure that he swims in with grace and intellect 24 hours a day seven days a week.

The conservative bigots at Breitbart however see America and Terra quite differently. The long for the days when America [read white men} controlled the world. I would be the first to admit the words of John Fitzgerald Kennedy ring loud and true today in America as compared to when the average TEA Partier was 20 years old, “The world is very different now.” Back in that time the mid 1970s some social change had been made but as Reagan entered office in 1981 there was a collective sigh of relief on the Right. The times were still economically tough, but Democrats in the Congress worked with Reagan to pull America out of the economic mess of the post Nixon, Ford, and Carter administrations. No such thing has happened during Obama’s tenure in the White House. The GOP, hijacked by the TEA Party has become an Enemy of the White House as they are allied against the President on every several issue.

The reason for this is that the far Right feels that the loud voices who call for America to “go back to the Constitution” were put off by both Romney and before him McCain. What is really true is the GOP is no longer a viable national party because a full third of them, those with TEA Party/Koch Brothers alliances have to cater to a rabid minority of 25 million voters who believe thing like you will see below which are comments made at Breitbart.com to a post made by Robert Wilde about the Obamas not attending church on 25 December 2013 while on vacation in Hawaii:

George Clark what_what_what • 12 hours ago
Reagan didn’t go to church, after getting elected, because of the burden it would have put upon the parishioners, with all the Secret Service agents, etc. At least that was the reason he gave. No one ought to be holding Obama to a higher standard, agreed. Old Scratch, though, doesn’t seem to mind shutting down an entire restaurant so he can eat a hamburger while all other patrons do without while he chows down–he could easily invite the chefs to prepare his burger at the White House, couldn’t he, and spare the other patrons the inconvenience? I don’t remember Reagan holding Waffle House hostage so he could belly up to a good pancake breakfast. I’m sure Barry would happily shut down an entire megachurch for Christmas prayer for himself and his nappy little brood if it gave a good photo-op for him. Reagan, like Obama, was the king of staged photo-ops. Remember that hilarious one where the Secret Service staged an assassination attempt on Reagan to boost his popularity in the polls? Obama ought to try that one, what with his poll numbers sinking to Nixonian levels and lower.

Cobra212 Edlhackney • 5 hours ago
It becomes our business when a candidate for President presents himself as a practicing Christian, continues to present himself as having Christian beliefs, while behind the scenes is something totally different. As President, his beliefs are our business when we as voters are making a decision about who we want to lead this country. When that person lies to us for the sole purpose of deceiving us into believing he is something he isn’t just to get elected, then we should all be concerned.

Ronald B. Stetton joeschmo8675309 • 12 hours ago −
The “majority that voted,” voted against God. What has happened since is just noise. The Muslim took the popular vote in 2008. Whatever has happened since is deception. We have seen our last freely-elected President.
It’s over…

flahorsedentist Ronald B. Stetton • 6 hours ago −
My daughter has a good friend who is Jewish Iranian. Her grandmother (who fled Iran after the shah was deposed) says Obama speaks and acts like a Muslim. She says this about all things Obama. She also is adamant about anyone with a name Hussein is Muslim period.

woodsman1st joeschmo8675309 • 5 hours ago −
The only “shovel ready jobs” we can ever expect from obama will be to bury our dead that he personally murdered with his DEATH PANELS AND HIS OBAMACARE.
Obama is well on the way to becoming a mass murderer as bad as any in the entire history of the world.
ONLY OUR 2ND AMENDMENT IS PREVENTING THIS!

Mark McIntyre Ronald B. Stetton • 3 hours ago −
Obama is a muslim pig, and should be hung for treason. He is a bastard

George Clark rm56 • 10 hours ago −
I’ve been reading some of your insightful and grammatically correct posts, buckwheat:

“Oh yes, and I hope all the people out of work and all the people who lost their insurance vote conservative!”

What’s your point? We long ago stopped locking up mental defectives like yourself, Elmer–maybe we ought to start doing it again? I’ve heard that Obamacare has a lot of provisions for mandatory mental health care for waterheads like yourself. I have a cousin who works for the government, and he’s shown me some of the new rules for commitment. One of them is that if the subject has an atavistic fear of using proper grammar, such as apostrophes and commas, he is going to be locked up. A sure sign of mental illness, according to the new Obamacare rules. They will be coming after you soon, Elmer. My advice to you is to stop posting. Every grammatically incorrect sentence that you post is just more evidence needed for Obama and his boys to lock you up. As a conservative, I very much wish that you can just be safe in your mentally defective way, and keep hanging out in the library and such, and taking your methadone and all. But Obama is coming after you, man. Eric Holder is going to lock you up for being mentally defective. Just trying to watch out for a poor soul, that’s all. Take care, man, and when The Real Man knocks on your door, head out the fire escape.

JR1984 • 16 hours ago
Obummer got reelected, why does he need to go to church now. He paid his dues to Reverend Wright and made a whole lot of low information voters think he cared. He did not and does not.
Communist do not like religion as they want people to believe in the government and that all things come from the government. To believe in GOD means the people believe in a higher power, and we know Obummer thinks he is a God and there is no higher power. On Judgment Day he is in for a RUDE surprise.

David Epperson • 16 hours ago
Most churchs in Hawaii have pews below Moochelle weight limit.

lemonlime St Marc • 14 hours ago
So, you also think it would be wrong to judge someone like Hitler, too? Note to the faux St. Marc………..most of us are not southern, and we call it like it is. The only “hate” is what Obama has directed to the U.S. population and especially our troops.

George Clark St Marc • 10 hours ago
You cast the first stone, buckwheat. I despise hypocrites. I guess that there are more good Christians in the North? Are they hypocrites like yourself, who throw stones? You aren’t a Christian, you make me sick.

“Mucho Christians inda SOUTH…”

Also, you should have paid attention to your third grade teacher when s/he was teaching grammar, buckwheat.

gcunning • 16 hours ago
All aspects of my life revolve around my faith and I despise O more than most but this is a non-story. I don’t care if he goes to a building to worship Christ….but I’ve never believed his life was centered around Christianity in anyway, one can’t do what he’s done and claim to be a practicing Christain….color me not affected by O’s lack of Christian faith.

pnipni • 14 hours ago
…because he’s pretending to be Christian when we all know that he receives daily texts from his Imam. He’s some kind of Muslim.
.
As a side note, the news states that he’s being advised by SIX muslim Brotherhood members. . Do we need to know any more about this IMPOSTER and TRAITOR.

Media outlest including Fox News reported the Obama family spent part of the holiday at Marine Corps Base Hawaii.

Qu’ul cuda praedex nihil!

Ciu Cava daelth Nixhot, J.F.. D.S.V.J.
Consiglieri
The Dis Brimstone Daily Pitchfork
74 1 Leviathan 2 AS

VOX POPULI: PHIL ROBERTSON, NEOCON1 AND THE REAL COST OF BIGOTRY

Posted in BIGOTRY, CHRISTIAN PERSECUTION IN AMERICA?, CONSERVATIVE ANTI-INTELLECTUALISM, CONSERVATIVE BIGOTRY, CONSERVATIVE FEAR, CONSERVATIVE HYPOCRISY, CONSERVATIVE IGNORANCE, CONSERVATIVE INCITEMENT TO VIOLENCE, CONSERVATIVE LIES, CONSERVATIVE NEWS, CONSERVATIVE OBSESSION WITH SEX, CONSERVATIVE VIOLENCE, NEOCON1, THE BLAZE, THE CONSIGLIERI, WILLIAM J LOGAN JR with tags , , , on 21/12/2013 by consigliereciucava

Thoeressamt

The MSM has made quite a bit out of Duck Dynasty patriarch Phil Robertson’s comments about homosexuality. I am one of the few here at The Dis Brimstone-Daily Pitchfork that is not a journalist. I am a practitioner of the law here in Hell’s capital Dis. To me, the issue swirling around A&E and their reality star is not a matter of 1st amendment rights at all; it is a matter of how much one is willing to sacrifice to hold on to their personal beliefs.

The right to free speech is codified, federally, in the 1st amendment to the United States Constitution as:

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.”

Clearly, this is not a de facto or de jure allowance of all speech. The 1st amendment begins with the words, “Congress shall make no law . . .” and it continues to state that the body of people who represent the American eligible voters and their minor offspring will not establish a state religion, nor shall they prohibit the free exercise of religion or prohibit free speech or governmental interference in the Free Press. So to inject more clarity, had Congress passed a law stating that Phil Robertson or anyone can no longer express their religion based beliefs in public, or on the airwaves, this would have been a violation of the 1st amendment. The simple fact that his comments or some of the ones below from Neocon1 of Blogs for Victory infamy have caused the ire of Progressives, Moderates and Conservatives alike have little to do with 1st amendment and more to do with how society feels today in 2013 about bigoted speech.

I feel that the words of Phil Robertson were a stentorian shout of bigotry based in biblical beliefs. Robertson has a right to express these beliefs but what he doesn’t have is the right to bear no consequences economically for expressing them. One must keep in mind that America is far from being a democracy. The United States is a corporate oligarchy, and quite a complex one, married with a representative constitutional republic. Corporations gain far more from the federal government than individuals do, however, the system still would work on behalf of the individual or in the case of the LGBT community if their interests mesh with those of corporate powers.

That said I come to Neocon1 who has said many bigoted things in the past and seems to relish the fact that his comments make Progressives and others angry. For years the moderators at Blogs4Victory have simply gone along with this man’s rants and ravings which are regularly anti-black, anti-LGBT and anti-Obama. He has a right to do this and has been allowed by the moderators to do so until most recently when they responded to an anti-LGBT rant in this manner:

Neocon1: I guess quotes from the Catholic church and it’s saints over the years fails the homosexual PC test. very sad.

You seem to be saying that moderators are homosexuals defending a PC position. Not so. But your constant ranting about homosexuality and your constant efforts to justify your rants have resulted in having all of them removed. And they will be continued to be removed no matter how many Catholics you quote. Enough on this subject. No more homosexual rants, no more white hut rants, no more Kenyan rants. Be sad but enough is enough. //Moderator

While the B4V comments were removed some of his comments at one of his favorite haunts The Blaze have been archived and follow:

neocon1Jun. 20, 2013 at 4:31pm
this was a cherry picked case by left wing S**Tcago racist mobs to over turn the stand your ground laws in Fla.
It all falls into his insane destruction of the 2nd amendment in order to usher in his marxist/muslim paradise.
Make NO mistake about it our GOP governor scott FOLDED like a piece of tissue paper when confronted by lunatic blacks marching, beating, looting, murdering threatening all in the name of “justice” for a doper, thieving, fist fighting thug, named NO_LIMIT_NI^^AH.

Hope ole George likes being in jail with the rest of the DEMOCRAT blacks who hate white (hispanics)

One can read the pattern of bigotry and his hatred for blacks at The Blaze and while William J Logan aka Neocon1 isn’t a public figure on television, like Robertson he is a businessman. The Moderator has finally put his foot down at B4V with:

This is a pattern of yours. You obsess about something and post about it over and over again, you get deeper and deeper into your obsession, and when you get called on it you act innocent and hurt. You know what you do and you know you like to push things as far as you can. You have made your point plenty of times and have crossed the line from just reposting things of interest into selecting things that support your personal prejudice and hammering the topic incessantly. You know what “enough” means and whining about being called on your efforts to see how far you can go with your posts will end up getting all of your posts removed. // Moderator

Maybe Mr Logan will learn his lesson and decide a blog is not the best place to vent his spleen about those to whom he bears prejudice and anger. It would be terrible to think however that a man with such beliefs would find a forum for such retrograde ideas but to express is and always will be his right.

Qu’ul cuda praedex nihil!

Ciu Cava daelth Nixhot, J.F.. D.S.V.J.
Consiglieri
The Dis Brimstone Daily Pitchfork
68 1 Leviathan 2 AS

VOX POPULI: THE RIGHT DISCOVERS NEW MEDIA

Posted in THE CONSIGLIERI, VOX POPULI with tags , on 07/10/2013 by consigliereciucava

Thoeressamt

As the new media becomes the established media over the next few decades in America the medium is becoming the message. Ben Shapiro of Breitbart.com infamy has launched TruthRevolt.org whose mission is summed up with:

The media win elections for the left. It’s not the left’s competence in office; leftists have demonstrated none. It’s not the left’s ideas; leftist ideas have failed everywhere they have been tried. The left wins for one simple reason: leftists control the information distribution system in the United States. And they use that system to pillory conservatives heartless bigots intent on harming the poor and targeting minorities.

The media must be destroyed where they stand. That is our mission at Truth Revolt. The goal of TruthRevolt is simple: unmask leftists in the media for who they are, destroy their credibility with the American public, and devastate their funding bases.

TruthRevolt focuses on high-profile media members, and holding them accountable. But TruthRevolt does not stop there. TruthRevolt understands that all politics is local, and therefore looks to fight leftist propaganda at the local level, monitoring local newspapers, television and radio. TruthRevolt also seeks to stop the left dead in its tracks when it comes to training the next generation, our college campuses.

TruthRevolt works to make advertisers and funders aware of the leftist propaganda they sponsor – and bringing social consequences to bear to create pressure on such advertisers and funders.

This will get personal. This will get rough. We’re ready for action.

We need your help, and we want you to get involved — not just by giving money, but by becoming a TruthRevolt fighter. See our “Join the Fight” page to learn how you can help.

I find this an interesting mission statement and have offered it to the rest of the editorial writers here to comment upon today.

Qu’ul cuda praedex nihil!

Ciu Cava daelth Nixhot, J.F.. D.S.V.J.
Consiglieri
The Dis Brimstone Daily Pitchfork
141 Colnu 2 AS

VOX POPULI: WHY PARI BRADLEE IS MY HERO

Posted in CONSERVATIVE OBSESSION WITH SEX, FOX NEWS, HOWARD KURTZ, THE CONSIGLIERI with tags on 29/08/2013 by consigliereciucava

Thoeressamt

To anyone working in journalism here in Hell the name Ben Bradlee is revered. As historical figures go Benjamin Crowninshield Bradlee could have done anything he wanted with his life. He served in the Pacific during WWII in the United States Navy as an intelligence officer. Her returned home and poured himself into journalism. If you recall he was portrayed by Jason Robards in the motion picture All The President’s Men.

Ben Bradlee turned 92 on Monday of this week and on a personal note I wish him many many more happy birthdays. Now to the more odious reason of my post today as consiglieri of this newspaper. On that day, Howard Kurtz who now works for Fox News after a stint at CNN, wrote this article about Bradlee’s daughter in law Pari Bradelee. The article is almost nonsense and it is definitely not news. Kurtz seems to have settled into the other side of the Fox News de rigueur of oftentimes thinking that anything that comes to mind, especially if it has a titillating aspect, is worthy of a column.

Pari Bradlee

The article makes one think before delving into who Pari Bradlee is that she had been photographed naked, or nearly naked as if there would have been something inherently wrong about that. There is a quite elegant, feminine and artistic photo of Pari looking confident and stunning on her Facebook page that seems to have become a brainworm in Kurtz’s mind. Then the article becomes really bizarre. Kurtz informs his readers, “In another just-posted photo she is nude, shot from the back, twisting one arm behind her.” Then he asks his audience, “Do the pictures go too far?” I find it difficult to cough up enough petals to even offer that question a reply.

pari bradlee 2

The quote explaining the photo that is offered by Howard Kurtz is done in a style that would have a freshman journalism professor wincing and reaching for his red marker:


“I have worked so hard all my life and always wanted to feel and be beautiful inside and out,” Bradlee writes on Facebook. “I own my sensuality and teach others not to repress it. Femininity for me is a very powerful and beautiful force.” She says the bra, which looks like someone took a scissors to it, was suggested by “my beautiful Persian QUEEN Maryam Amirimaidi” and that her mother-in-law, Sally Quinn, “bought me those Louboutins” — the only other thing she is wearing.

The actual quote from Ms Bradlee is:

This is a very special photo for me for various reasons: It’s in a room that I’ve always dreamed of, one of my dearest friends took it and made me laugh so much I was sore! I have worked so hard all of my life and always wanted to feel and be beautiful inside and out. I own my sensuality and teach others to not repress it. Femininity for me is a very powerful and beautiful force. The bra was suggested my my beautiful Persian QUEEN Maryam Amirmajdi in her store Jaryam. I would have never picked that out. She said it was made for me as well as the shrug. Sally bought me those Louboutins.
I’ve always wanted a picture like that. Barry gave me one of the best gifts I’ve ever received. I will treasure it forever.
It’s a symbol of overcoming being bullied and told that I would never make it in life. A poor girl from the hood that could never afford nice things and take care of herself. A symbol of overcoming pain in general and showing all beings in the world that you can be who you wish to be no matter what.

Very strong words from a strong and beautiful woman versus the a writer who has taken the low road and by doing so damaged his journalistic reputation for no reason at all. Kurtz even got wrong that Ms Bradlee was wearing something other than a bra. It is my opinion that Howard Kurtz is one of those types of people that are bullies that Pari mentions. The scandal here is not the art and beauty of the human form but why Howard Kurtz felt he could throw such feces on the wall of the Internet and no one would call him out. We it possible for me to travel to Terra, and seeing that Pari Bradlee is fond of cigars I would enjoy sitting somewhere quietly with her, and her husband of course, and enjoying a nice Cuban Presidente. Of course, this too would outrage Howard Kurtz and his loyal readers!

Qu’ul cuda praedex nihil!

Ciu Cava daelth Nixhot, J.F.. D.S.V.J.
Consiglieri
The Dis Brimstone Daily Pitchfork
104 Colnu 2 AS

VOX POPULI: REBUT BLOGS4VICTORY IS UP AND RUNNING

Posted in BLOGS 4 VICTORY, CIVIL RIGHTS, CLASS WARFARE, CONSERVATIVE ANTI-INTELLECTUALISM, CONSERVATIVE BIGOTRY, CONSERVATIVE FEAR, CONSERVATIVE HYPOCRISY, CONSERVATIVE IGNORANCE, CONSERVATIVE INCITEMENT TO VIOLENCE, CONSERVATIVE LIES, CONSERVATIVE NEWS, CONSERVATIVE SEX SCANDAL, CONSERVATIVE STUPID EMAIL FORWARDS, CONSERVATIVE VIOLENCE, COUNTER-THEOCRACY, MARK EDWARD NOONAN, REBUT BLOGSFORVICTORY, THE CONSIGLIERI, WATSONTHETHIRD with tags on 01/07/2013 by consigliereciucava

Thoeressamt

Progressive commenter Watsonthethird has opened a new blog whose tripartite purpose is to rebut the commentary of the conservatives at Blogs4Victory, become a storage of progressive fact based comments before they deleted and to expose the hypocrisy of the dying Right. The site is called RebuttingBlogsForVictory and it is required reading for anyone who wishes to live the history of the decline and fall of American conservatism in an age of demographic tectonics.

Qu’ul cuda praedex nihil!

Ciu Cava daelth Nixhot, J.F.. D.S.V.J.
Consiglieri
The Dis Brimstone Daily Pitchfork
52 Colnu 2 AS

VOX POPULI: REACTIONS FROM BLOGS TO THE DOMA AND PROP 8 SCOTUS DECISIONS

Posted in BREITBART, BREITBART IS STILL DEAD, THE CANCER OF HATE, THE CONSIGLIERI, THE CULTURE WARS, VOX POPULI with tags , , , , , on 26/06/2013 by consigliereciucava

Thoeressamt

There is a flood of commentary to blog posts on the conservative side of the Internet about today’s SCOTUS decisions on Proposition 8 and the Defense of Marriage Act. We start at Breitbart:

PIKEMASTER bdaughtry • 4 hours ago −
America is doomed!

And once again, SCOTUS has betrayed us when we needed them. There will be no chance of saving this evil country any longer. The choice has been made, thanks to Obama’s new immoral court!

Our only chance to save this now, is to tear it down and start over. And America will surely fail all by itself, now that the direction it has taken is beyond repair !

txdave22 PIKEMASTER • 4 hours ago −
SCOTUS SAYS DOMA UNCONSTITUTIONAL. ———————————————-GOD IF HE EXISTS IS PRO CHOICE AND PRO GAY RIGHTS. DO YOU UNDERSTAND HOW WRONG YOU HAVE BEEN.————THANKS TO RONALD REAGAN FOR APPOINTING ANTHONY KENNEDY, THE MOST FAIRMINDED GOP APPOINTEE IN HISTORY. You must consider the ramifications of how wrong you’ve been. We do not live under the bible, koran, or book of mormon, but the CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.

ruffn3k txdave22 • 4 hours ago −
lol what? You think that God is ok with paying a doctor to murder a child because you dont feel like dealing with it, and he’s ok with two people that cannot even have intercourse to be wed? Try reading the Bible sometime, its a real eye opener. Unless you were being sarcastic..

john copper ruffn3k • 4 hours ago −
Which part of the Bible? The passage that says to kill children that misbehave or kill people for working on sunday?

These from The Blaze:

NO1HD
Jun. 26, 2013 at 2:18pm
I am glad they, the gays are now putting their names on papers, sharia law and the muslims hate gays and will clean the system when they get here.

ARMEDANDREALLYPISSED
Jun. 26, 2013 at 2:49pm
MuSLIMES hate everyone. Even other MuSLIMES. Gays won’t be the only ones with Targets on their backs ( or quickly chopped off Heads ). But your right. The Project. Alive and well in AmeriKa. Compliments of the Black MuSLIME Hitler.

NO1HD
Jun. 26, 2013 at 2:13pm
These laws were wrongfully given to you gay people by a failing scotus. By deciding which laws under the ‘In God We Trust’ atmosphere they can make right and wrong they now have made all laws ok – murder and stealing among the main ones. These people say they can pick and choose – bet that’s not going to work out well for them.
Next, what law or set odf rules give the scotus any powers the people’s vote and how can it be overturned or maybe just do away with the scotus.

VAMAN
Jun. 26, 2013 at 2:08pm
This story stinks of desperation by the blaze. Anything to give its readers a glimmer of hope that somehow their unexplainable bigotry will endure. Today was the death knell to about the last christian promoted biblical form of prejudice in this country. Soon Federal law will trump the existing bigoted laws of States that will not permit true freedom and equality. Gay marriage is coming to your state and town sooner than you think and no amount of praying will stop it. Another in a long line of social battles lost by radicalized christians, making this truly the greatest country in the history of the world.

ECHOBRAVOLEADER
Jun. 26, 2013 at 3:10pm
Sadly, this decision violates the very principles of political discord and discussion within and between the states. All state laws that currently deny same sex marriage can and will be overturned using this SCOTUS opinion. This was a political nullification of legislative authority, not a judicial ruling. It rewrites the definition of marriage to mean “NOTHING.” By extension of using the 5th amendment to justify same-sex marriage on an equality basis, it means that all forms of interpersonal relations should have equal standing under the law including polygamy, incestuous marriage, young child/adult marriage, posthumous marriage, and perhaps even marriage between humans and animals. It may also remove marriage as a defining term as equality might also be meant to mean rights of unmarried roommates or lovers living together. This goes hand in hand with the dissolution of religious freedoms and practices, the nuclear family and the role of parents in raising a child.

It also seems to grant the Supremes new powers to interpret the law they way “they see fit,” not the way the elected legislative representatives established the law. This is a dangerous precedent which does not bode well for a constitutional republic.

For those that don’t think that this a planned attack on our society and constitution, Google the Communist Manifesto and read it. It shouldn’t take more than a half hour to understand the main points.

HYPERION5182
Jun. 26, 2013 at 1:40pm
I dont even read this article for one reason.

The supreme court has called me a bigot. Has called EVERYONE who believes in the constitution and the RULE OF LAW bigots. Everyone should read Scallia’s dissent and see what those five BITCHES IN ROBES think of the people.

These from RedState:

streiff Mod • 3 hours ago −
I think this is a cross between exotic reasoning and wishful thinking. The Court clearly laid the predicate for laws prohibiting gay marriage to be overturned on equal protection grounds. This was not a decision based on federalism but rather on a very expansive and big government friendly point of view.

The real issue is one that Ben Domenech brought up earlier in the week in The Transom. This decision makes it clear that the government is willing, for the time being, to accept a Freedom of Worship. It has declared war on Freedom of Religion.

jpkoch streiff • an hour ago −
Outstanding post. I’ve noticed during the last 12 months, Progressives say, “We have nothing against your freedom of private worship. But, the minute you exit your church you are prohibited from expressing what you believe.”

The Free Exercise of Religion is, like you point out, is under assault.

congressworksforus streiff • 2 hours ago −
I suggest you read more opinions from the experts. For one, the reasoning was not at all on 14th Amendment grounds, but on 5th Amendment Liberty grounds. Second, the majority opinion is littered with Federalism aspects. Thirdly, read the final sentence of the opinion, and then come back and theorize on what the opinion actually covers…

streiff Mod congressworksforus • 2 hours ago −
Yeah, well I don’t need to read mythology. I read the opinion. I hope you realize that the last sentence did not pertain to the issue the court was deciding. You can continue to believe in leprechauns but the idea that this is anything but a body blow to laws defining marriage as 1 man, 1 woman is just nonsense.

congressworksforus streiff • 2 hours ago −
We don’t need laws defining it. We need the government to get out of the marriage business. Marriage is between 1 man, 1 woman and their God.

Not between 2 adults and the government.

There are civil union laws for that.

celador2 runner12 • 26 minutes ago −
I would have liked them to address the CA state sup court and how that arrogant judge voided the people’s amendment prop 8. By what authority did he void their amendment? How common is that?
Imagine the people of CA having no ‘standing’ in court over writing the laws they live under!
LALLAL land Orwell, are you here? No its more like the Soviet union or some totalitarian terror zone now.

And last but certainly not least, these from IOwntheWorld.com

Stirrin the BS
June 26th, 2013
This nothing to do with gay marriage and everything to do with shredding the moral fabric and foundation upon which this country was built.

Once completed, communism enters in to fill the vacuum. Like a sinister cancer.

Dr. Tar
June 26th, 2013
Expect every state with a marriage definition law to be challenged this year, especially if liberal judges can be lined up to hear the cases and the appeals.

I wonder when the rest of the sexual deviants will come crawling out of the wood work demanding their rights (polygamist, incestuous families, even necrophiliacs)?

Shudder

MaryfromMarin
June 26th, 2013
John Adams was a prophet. Now we are living in prophetic times.

IMO, the focus now shifts: from how to restore the Christian/moral foundation of our country, to how can we as Christians/moral people survive in a country that is intent on beating us down and eliminating us.

Bob
June 26th, 2013
When you eliminate right and wrong, all that remains is might makes right. In other words we descend back into a pagan society.

Chief
June 26th, 2013
Well, our faggy brethren, breath your “victory” in deeply and savor the moment.

You’ll want to recall this later when you’re the first wave hauled off under Sharia Law.

bitterclinger
June 26th, 2013
Gays want to marry as much as they want the plague. This is about destroying religions by forcing churches, who otherwise wouldn’t, to marry sodomites. Wonder how Bammy’s musloid handlers will like this?

Liberal Larry
June 26th, 2013
To all my gay brothers and sisters (and straight friends who have supported us), think about this for a minute.

We didn’t just witness history today. We became a part of it. Every last one of us. While those who are against us simply watched us make progress toward full equality in the biggest political, legal and social event to date where gay rights are concerned (even bigger than the repeal of DADT), we were actually a part of that progress.

One day, when we’re talked about in text books the way the black community is now (including the right to enter interracial marriages), we won’t simply read about it. And we won’t simply have watched it happen. We will have lived it. We will have caused it.

No matter what else happens from here on out, nothing and no one can take away the fact that we didn’t just witness history being made; we made it.

Suck on that, bigots.

Qu’ul cuda praedex nihil!

Ciu Cava daelth Nixhot, J.F.. D.S.V.J.
Consiglieri
The Dis Brimstone Daily Pitchfork
47 Colnu 2 AS

VOX POPULI: THE REAL FEELINGS OF CONSERVATIVES IN AMERICA

Posted in BIG FUR HAT, BIGOTRY, BIRTHERISM, CONSERVATIVE BIGOTRY, CONSERVATIVE FEAR, CONSERVATIVE HYPOCRISY, CONSERVATIVE IGNORANCE, CONSERVATIVE INCITEMENT TO VIOLENCE, CONSERVATIVE LIES, CONSERVATIVE NEWS, CONSERVATIVE VIOLENCE, COUNTER-SHAI'TANISM, COUNTER-THEOCRACY, THE CONSIGLIERI, VOX POPULI with tags , , , , on 05/04/2013 by consigliereciucava

Thoeressamt

This will be brief this morning as we have more important news to report today. There is a growing resentment among white supremacists and their common conservative allies recently for both the federal authority which many of them see as illegitimate because of the leadership of the Executive Branch being in the hands of President Barack H Obama as well as for a group of citizens that these people feel have done ill to the United States over many decades. That group to these bigots would include the entire LGBT community, blacks, Latinos and anyone who sides with their ongoing struggles for rights and equality. Here are three comments from IOwnTheWorld.com that bear this out and point to connections to why so many in law enforcement have been slaughtered in the past few months:

Jethro–

So Freddie believes morals are some set of rules that those above us wield to keep us in control. That is truly a leftist perspective – Something else the STATE has in order to control us.
Dumbass! Morals are inherent within the psyche of all humans. They just have to be exposed to rational minded children as “the right thing to do” otherwise, there will be ramifications. Those who are irrational (like Lanza) will never get it. That’s why we have institutions.
Dear Freddie – you need to thank God conservatives (the majority of the people on earth) have morals. If some day they chose to give them up people like you will be the first dangling from the lamp posts. If you don’t believe in God now, then you most likely will during those last few seconds as you’re being strung up.

Johnny–

I hate white liberals and I hate ni66ers,I don’t consider it racist to hate this human shit for what they have done and what we have allowed them to do to our country,hating evil isn’t racist and if it is then racism is a good thing.If we don’t get a handle on these two groups,we can kiss our country goodbye,you don’t have to go around advertising that you hate these two groups but you can work behind the scenes to undermine everything they do,you can teach your children that these are not people to emulate and associate with.They are garbage and they will pull you down,if you allow your children to become filth like these two groups,you are an unfit parent and you deserve the children you get.Teach your children that we are headed towards a civil war and the ni66ers and white liberals will be exterminated,if they want to be on the winning side,they need to act like humans,not baboons.

Brett–

When my children were young,they were not allowed to associate with ni66ers or bring them to my home,it worked because since they have grown up,they see what the ni66er is all about and they thank me for not allowing them to associate with ni66ers.They don’t allow their children to associate with ni66ers,if enough people practice this,the ni66ers will not have the influence on your children like they have now. Ni66ers have no culture,they are a cursed race and the black shitskin they have is the mark of cain.

It appears that these comments have been allowed to stay up at their site and this is perfectly fine because Progressive want the other side to speak their hearts. If they do this more often their demise, politically, will come sooner rather than later. And as we all realize their children have minds of their own and they will seek their own paths to the truth rather than rely on the bigotries of past generations to guide them.

Qu’ul cuda praedex nihil!

Ciu Cava daelth Nixhot, J.F.. D.S.V.J.
Consiglieri
The Dis Brimstone Daily Pitchfork
216 Low Lux Negro 2 AS

VOX POPULI: RESPONSES TO THE WAPO EDITORIAL BY CHARLOTTE AND HARRIET CHILDRESS COVER A BROAD SPECTRUM

Posted in CONSERVATIVE FEAR, CONSERVATIVE HYPOCRISY, CONSERVATIVE IGNORANCE, CONSERVATIVE INCITEMENT TO VIOLENCE, CONSERVATIVE LIES, CONSERVATIVE NEWS, CONSERVATIVE VIOLENCE, CRIME BLOTTER, THE CONSIGLIERI, VOX POPULI with tags , , on 30/03/2013 by consigliereciucava

thoeressamt 2

Charlotte Childress and her twin sister Harriet Childress are scientists and authors who run the website Clueless At The Top which deals with recognizing hierarchies within society at large as well as in your personal lives. Their site is not only worth exploring but should be mandatory reading if anyone wants to find a way out of the current societal messes on Terra. These two women seem to have found the solution. The duo published an editorial on the nature of mass shootings in the Washington Post yesterday and it too is worth a serious read. Comments from the hoi polloi follow in blokquote:

DonnaG
3/29/2013 7:53 PM EDT
White men? Checked out the Chicago crime statistics lately?

DC74
3/29/2013 7:55 PM EDT
how many of those chicago crimes were mass shootings (which was by the way the topic of the article that seems to have alluded you)

DC74
3/29/2013 7:54 PM EDT
Flawed reasoning by the Childresses but I get their point.

If it is wrong to single out all Black people when a few Black people act unfavorably, it is similarly wrong to single out White males in the same manner.

That said, I get the point that there is stunning silence from the usual group of finger pointers on this topic.

jfv123
3/29/2013 7:57 PM EDT
This article reminds us that each socio-economic ethnic group has great people and not so great people.
- Men kill more adults than other people.
- Women kill their own babies.
- Blacks kill one another in dark lonely places for money.
- White boys kill lots of people in crowded places for no monetary gain.
- Muslims blow up people in Mosques or on pilgrimages.
- Hispanics kill people to control the drug trade.
We’re all sinners who on Good Friday need redemption.

epigonigrp
3/29/2013 7:57 PM EDT
Let’s just be clear:

80% of gun crime is committed by non whites
In 2011 54% of the murder victims were black, yet blacks are only 13% of the population.
Murder is the leading cause of death of black men 15-34 years of age.
Blacks are 9 times more likely to commit murder than a white person.

DC74
3/29/2013 8:04 PM EDT
can you give us the percentage of mass murders committed by white males (which was, by the way, the topic of this article)?

How about the percentages for white males and alcohol related crimes?

sexual crimes?

arson?

That said, it’s probably not a good idea to try to attribute the actions of a few to an entire group

Opechan
3/29/2013 9:10 PM EDT
Hilarious that it took less than 15 minutes for Epion to go full racist there!

Guess that’s what happens when you trip-up over yourself while scrambling to blame black people in response to what should be an introspective article.

paperisthin
3/29/2013 8:00 PM EDT
I don’t fully disagree with some of the points, but approaching any issue with this attitude only causes more damage. Two wrongs don’t make a right, and because white men have unfairly dominated American discourse up until now does not mean that making cultural blanket statements about them is any more correct than doing this to any other group.

I believe the healthier thing to do here is find common bonds among those that do commit these crimes to find out what took them to that place. Sure, white skin and being a male is often involved. But a lot of our population is white and male, so that’s a nearly pointless point to start building a case from. What other characteristics do these mass shooters share?

Again, I understand where the Childresses are coming from on a certain level, but their discourse is bigoted and doesn’t get to the deeper levels necessary.

GunLogic
3/29/2013 8:01 PM EDT
If by white men you are specifically refering to the gun nuts, give it up. They dont learn, and they dont discuss.

Ron Niger
3/29/2013 8:02 PM EDT
A very poorly written article and completely void of common sense research. If the authors lived in Montgomery or Chicago, they would notice right away the number of blacks killing blacks each year far exceed the numbers in the recent mass killings. Are the authors out of touch, shallow, or poor researchers? I don’t know, but I think they have serious problems with white men in particular, as long as they are conservative or members of the NRA!

djokinme
3/29/2013 8:02 PM EDT
It’s a valid point.. The most salient mass gun murders since Columbine have always been committed by white men.

If it had been any other demographic we would be demonizing them.

This coming from a white man.

hmgcpa52
3/29/2013 8:10 PM EDT
However, how many black on black killings happen every day? This coming from a white man!

baltimore6
3/29/2013 8:12 PM EDT
yes, but the point is if it was black on white killing, or blacks committing mass killing sprees they would be demonized. let’s be real, white people don’t care if black people kill black other black people.

oldguyfossil
3/29/2013 8:05 PM EDT
Since republicans want pee test to make sure welfare recipients are not drug addicts perhaps we should require pee tests before white men buy guns?

DonnaG
3/29/2013 8:05 PM EDT
statistics from the FBI show that black males are the cause of crime
Now the liberals do their best to try and say this isnt true
The reasoning is that by supporting the blacks do not cause crime in turn the blacks will support gay marriage
The liberal mantra…destroy the country one step at a time

coolcal71
3/29/2013 8:07 PM EDT
There is also treatment for paranoia.

gurudev16
3/29/2013 9:31 PM EDT
Interesting to see “white men” here overreacting to even the mildest critique of their behavior and culture. When the observations are in reverse theses same guys never display the slightest hesitance to be withering in condemnations and contempt. The authors state a fact that has been part of the culture and history of this country ( and other countries influenced by this Western cult) since its beginnings- a profoundly hypocritical and dishonest double standard. If white men get a pass-to many white boys grow up believing- they are not to be challenged even in their most pernicious machinations. Call it what it is-despite a history of accomplishment, many “white” men seem overwhelmed by a inferiority complex that just won’t quit.

Qu’ul cuda praedex nihil!

Ciu Cava daelth Nixhot, J.F.. D.S.V.J.
Consiglieri
The Dis Brimstone Daily Pitchfork
210 Low Lux Negro 2 AS

VOX POPULI: ANOTHER BLOGS4VICTORY CONSERVATIVE GETS THE FACTS WRONG

Posted in BLOGS 4 VICTORY, CONSERVATIVE FEAR, CONSERVATIVE HYPOCRISY, CONSERVATIVE IGNORANCE, MARRIAGE EQUALITY, SCOTUS, THE CONSIGLIERI, VOX POPULI with tags , , , , , on 26/03/2013 by consigliereciucava

Thoeressamt

One of the chief reasons the Conservative wing in politics in America is failing is because they will use incorrect facts to support their social agenda. Just last night, at Blogs4Victory dbschmidt posted this:

With your comment about “The reason conservatives are losing elections is because people who say they are conservatives really do believe things like being gay or lesbian or bisexual or transgender disqualifies you from public service/civil rights/ personal freedom or any of the other benefits a great democracy can bestow because a few people feel their so called morals and religion are more important than what is actually right.” and in particular civil rights, and “great democracy” I feel a need to put things into perspective.

First, and foremost–this great experiment is considered a republic–but I am sure that is what you meant. Nevertheless, Gay, or otherwise, marriage has been rejected every time it has become an issue that can be voted on by the people of the US–so you resort to the SCOTUS where nine people can force your so called “right”, or better yet “civil right”, down over 90% of the US populations throat.

Personally, I really do not think it is the job of the government to decide social issues like this but I was wondering how you feel about (being nice here) the justices deciding for over 90% of Americans what we need to “believe?” Well, for now they did decide ObamaCare was a tax so what if they also decide every American needs to purchase and be trained in the use a firearms? You up for nine folks in robes deciding your life?

I am not against the SCOTUS but somewhat against the cases they now hear.

Now as a Thoeressamt my language doesn’t have a word for “smarmy” which was the word Fred Schwartz used to describe dbschmidt’s barb about the United States being a “republic” vice a “democracy”. The conservative wanted to show me that he was more knowledgeable about the nature of the American system of government. I can accept that on the basis that in my native tongue those words are interchangeable. What I cannot accept is that he continued to parrot the untrue line about marriage equality not ever having been approved by the voters in any state in his Union. Four states, Maine, Maryland, Minnesota and Washington all voted in support of marriage equality in the election this past November.

the power of love

I disagree with dbschmidt in that there are times and there are issues that need to be resolved socially by the SCOTUS and that this issue of marriage equality is one of those issues. From what I can see, the Defense of marriage Act is unconstitutional since it creates a second class status for LGBT persons who wish to commit to those that they love with the same rights as heterosexual couples. True, I do not have the many layers of baggage that many conservatives carry about the issue. To me and many with whom I work and interact with daily this is simply an issue of full faith and credit on the legal side and of love and family on the emotional side. The facts are the facts and with those facts in mind I believe the side of civil rights will win over the side of decaying faux moralism.

Qu’ul cuda praedex nihil!

Ciu Cava daelth Nixhot, J.F.. D.S.V.J.
Consiglieri
The Dis Brimstone Daily Pitchfork
207 Low Lux Negro 2 AS

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 37 other followers

%d bloggers like this: