To end this fine day, at least from me, this from the moderator at Blogs4Victory:

Does anyone have any ideas on how to handle posts that are in response to posts that will be/are deleted? With a policy of deleting certain kinds of posts the blog becomes incoherent when so many responses are left behind to posts that have been removed. If you people love these other posters so much you need to make sure their footprints are left behind when they are removed from the blog, then go right ahead and keep answering them. Or you could just proceed in conversations with other conservatives and let the janitorial service catch up when it can. Your call. // Moderator

The blog BECOMES incoherent? Really?

Now I’m off to get laid. Sleep well you Princes of Progress, you Lords of Liberalism!

Breitbart adhux autem mortju! [Breitbart is still dead!]
Qu’ul cuda praedex nihil!

Sarah Bloch, D.S.V.J., J.F., O.Q.H [Jur.]
Amici Bax Demvolu Comnu
Politics & Culture Wars Managing Editor
The Dis Brimstone-Daily Pitchfork
24 Colnu 2 AS


  1. mitchethekid Says:

    He was talking about folks like us. After I say this, I hope my head will fit through the door way, but most specifically he was talking about me. The “he” being Matt. From what I understand, it’s his blog. The rest are visitors and some are visitors with privelages.

  2. dcobranchi Says:

    Typically nonsensical statement from B4V. Since there is no apparent rhyme or reason to what causes a comment to be pulled, how are they supposed to predict whether or not it’s okay to respond?

    • Fredrick Schwartz, D.S.V.J., O.Q.H. [Journ.] Says:

      Ser Daryl as a primer you can consider the following topics off limits even if the post is on such a topic:

      1) The Catholic Church sexual abuse scandal: This is a big No No. Any mention that this ever happened anywhere at any time will get you banned “for life” whatever that means. The chief enforcement officer for this of course is Mark Noonan who would have his entire papier-mâché world torn down by the realization that the pure thing that has saved him from a life of Onanism is now an evil institution bent on amassing power and money and offering only dreams as a reward for blind loyalty

      2) Support of abortion rights: This has cost Diane Valencen her privileges there on numerous occasions.

      3) Denial of Ronald Reagan as a deity: Included in this are any mention of Reagan having been a Democrat, being an advertising spokesman for Big Tobacco, having given amnesty to undocmented persons while President, or that Reagan was the governor who signed the bill that opened the door for Roe v. Wade in California in 1966.

      4) Recognizing that same sex marriage does not take anything away from hetero-marriage: This is a head exploding issue for most of the conservatives at B4V even though they post about it often in the hope that Progressives will go there to defend what is obviously a 14th amendment right.

      5) Any mention or linking to our blog: That is because Mark Noonan was a porn addict and we have been known to add a picture or two of an attractive male or female Human Being posing suggestively or engaged in sexual intercourse.

      6) Countering bigoted postings about minorities or the LGBTQ community with facts that show white Christianists do horrible things in the name of white Christianism: Such factual rebuttals are always deemed “racist” or “ageist” by the Moderator while imprecatory prayers by conservative posters about President Obama and his family go unpunished all the time.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: