MOVING TO THE CENTER? BLOGS FOR VICTORY BANS WILLIAM J LOGAN FROM COMMENTS


blochadvocate_7

I doubt if this a move to the center really but they did ban Neocon1 which shows two things that they finally realize that banning Progressives from voicing their views made them look stupid when they had bigots like him vomiting all over their comment section.

neocon01
January 3, 2014 at 7:57 am
Back just three days and already pushing the envelope and drawing lines you challenge us to cross. No more vulgarity no matter how cute you try spell it. No more racial insults. No more white hut comments. No more attacks on homosexuals. No more whining about blog standards. It is what it is. Deal with it or go away. There have been several moderator discussions about allowing you to post at all because you enjoy being offensive, so it will not take much to get you banned for good.

neocon01
January 3, 2014 at 1:34 pm
Good-bye. We hope you find a home you like better on some other blog. Maybe you will get lucky and find a blog willing to put up with your insults.

neocon01
January 4, 2014 at 1:18 pm
Man up, you two babies, and stop prowling around trying to find someone else to blame.

there is NO one blaming anyone, but to take down every rebuttal or answer and leave big bold screaming accusations and smears based on ONE “moderators” opinion smells of leftist alinsky tactics.
I do not know who this particular moderator is, but obviously they have a vendetta and is attempting to ban me, If so MAN UP and identify your self and explain your actions….COWARD!!

Moderator comments are routinely put in bold letters. Check it out. No “smears” have been written about you or anyone else. If you do not know who this moderator is, it is reckless and improper to make any accusations. If you have learned the personal name of a poster because that person trusted you and then you told another person this name that is a betrayal of trust. A friend of yours used the personal name of another poster on the blog, which is betrayal of trust for both of you. This post has been removed for this violation of blog policy. It was the blog policy when people posted what they said was your personal information. There is no vendetta. There are several moderators, both regular moderators and guest moderators. The goal of all is to ensure that the blog is a forum for rational discussion primarily about politics but can extend to other topics on occasion. Blog standards are at the discretion of the owners of the blog and to some extent of those chosen to help them moderate. They are objective and not based on any personal dislike. You have had many posts removed, sometimes five or six in a week. You have repeatedly been warned of various violations of blog policy. You have been kicked off the blog in the past for the same kind of behavior. You have a long history of posting offensive material and opinions. It is not the fault of any blog representative that you refuse to learn from your experiences. Moderators and owners have discussed banning you for good but decided to see if you could behave yourself. You can reserve the right to disagree with blog policy but you do not have the right to set it. You can reserve the right to determine what you think is appropriate content for the blog but you do not have the right to make that decision for the blog in general. There is no requirement of any poster or moderator to reveal any personal information and you have no authority to demand it.
You make the choice to post here and when you do you also make the choice to abide by blog regulations and standards. Those standards include not attacking or insulting people for enforcing them. Your posts this year have been hostile and insulting toward blog owners and moderators. This post has been left to show your attitude of entitlement. You do not have any entitlement to post here or to attack or insult moderators. When you violate blog policy you have no right to rebuttal. It is what it is. You follow it or you go somewhere else. Many other posters have learned this lesson. You are not singled out.
Your posts will be removed until January 15. This is the kind of time out given to children who misbehave. It is not the first time you have had a time out. If you think you can force yourself to be civil you can return then. If you think you can learn to post ideas and commentary instead of just repeating the same quotes and comments you can return then. If you think you can post without references that are vulgar, racist or homophobic you can return then. If moderation does not agree with your definition of those terms, the decision of moderation will be final. If you continue to insult moderators and blog owners you will not be allowed to post here again. //Moderator

However, with that said how are they any different from A&E? Neocon1 doesn’t work for them but he was allowed to express ideas that Mark and Matt were too cowardly to bring to the surface. I wonder if Amazona is willing to throw herself into the wood chipper to save Neocon1’s 1st amendment rights?

Qu’ul cuda praedex nihil!

Sarah Bloch, D.S.V.J., J.F., O.Q.H [Jur.]
Amici Bax Demvolu Comnu
Politics & Culture Wars Managing Editor
The Dis Brimstone-Daily Pitchfork
78 1 Leviathan 2 AS

21 Responses to “MOVING TO THE CENTER? BLOGS FOR VICTORY BANS WILLIAM J LOGAN FROM COMMENTS”

  1. sarahbloch Says:

    Even though I find your opinions odious Neocon1 you will always have a free speech forum where you can express what is on your mind as long as you are willing to take free speech as much as you give. You can vomit whatever hatred you wish here but realize by doing that you run the risk of having similar sent your way wrapped in facts that may make you look like a total idiot, not just an old bigot.

    • sarahbloch Says:

      I saw the MM thing way back in July 2012 when it first hit the Internet. I live for the day when Americans have gotten beyond both the Sharptons and the Malkins of the the punditsphere.

    • sarahbloch Says:

      Okay, the riot list again? All this proves Bill is that you can cut and paste from your favorite site Stormfront.

    • sarahbloch Says:

      Bill I criticize what passes for Christianity as practiced by many white American conservatives because their religion reinforces ideas of racial supremacy [no such thing exists] and age old bigotries and fears regarding multiculturalism and diversity. If you aren’t a homophobe then why the anti-homosexual rants that got you banned from B4V. Don’t worry we’re not going to ban you from here that’s not the way things run here. You might get insulted or exposed for being useful idiot of the Right, but not banned just for being an open foaming bigot.

    • sarahbloch Says:

      Oh and by the way fuck Mitt Romney he’s a billionaire what the fuck could he possibly care about me, Melissa Harris-Perry or anyone else he feels is beneath him because of his wealth. if his “feelings” were hurt then he was never fit to be President.

    • Fredrick Schwartz, D.S.V.J., O.Q.H. [Journ.] Says:

      By no means is anyone here a “Christophobe.” Like most the staff here I don’t want America to devolve into a Free Market Evangelical Theocracy. Of course the risk of that was far greater 30 years ago than it is today. But as I like to say, Never forget.” Disagreeing with you Logan doesn’t mean we’re fascist. It may mean that you are simply a closed minded fuck who has no power over anything more than what he owns.

    • Fredrick Schwartz, D.S.V.J., O.Q.H. [Journ.] Says:

      But curiously the posted list you put here was almost verbatim to one at StormFront.

  2. To the soul that resides in the body of William J Logan, We, Ourselves, of The Collective are bound by Our duty to remind you of the following:

    https://thedisbrimstonedailypitchfork.wordpress.com/2011/11/17/offering-comfort-to-an-ideological-adversary-in-his-time-of-need/#comments

    • Fredrick Schwartz, D.S.V.J., O.Q.H. [Journ.] Says:

      Give the GLBTQ community their inalienable civil rights and you’ll not have to ever hear anything else about it. What you are screeching about is a reaction to hundreds of years of oppression. The Gay Rights struggle is no different from the struggle for black civil rights a struggle which I must add is ongoing to this day.

    • Fredrick Schwartz, D.S.V.J., O.Q.H. [Journ.] Says:

      My colleagues are kinder than you can ever know.

    • Fredrick Schwartz, D.S.V.J., O.Q.H. [Journ.] Says:

      Every American, no matter their race, religion, sexual orientation or politics has the right to live their life as they wish within the LAW.

  3. Fredrick Schwartz, D.S.V.J., O.Q.H. [Journ.] Says:

    Bill you used this post in AT to paint any gathering of black people as a riot in the making. Here’s my angle; there are people who are easily moved to violence and a lack of self control in every race, religion, culture and nation on the planet. Here’s even more things that are FACTS. There’s nothing you can do about the guy that’s the President of the United States, legally, until the orderly transition of power on 20 January 2017. By then both of us will know what the American people have decided about the future of the country. We’ll know if the conservatives at the far Right like you have been able to muster the turnout or if they even have the numbers, to transform their hatred and bile into taking the Senate and keeping it and if they can elect a far Right President. If the GOP survives as a national party beyond 2016 I would call that either a; political miracle if their feud with the TEA Party isn’t resolved by the GOP jettisoning these Know Nothings; or a realization that the party must moderate and by doing so they are willing to be back benchers until the 55+ wingnuts are too old to have any political power. Here’s what you and I know: If you live to be 100 and vote in every presidential election from now til 2050 you will vote for president 9 more times. You will be the exception rather than the rule, politically and culturally, in your home state by 2030. By your last ballot in 2050 the “base” of the religious conservatives will have shrunk from what is estimated now at 37 million to less than 9 million. You don’t want blacks in your party. You don’t want Latinos in your party. White conservatives are dying and their kids are being converted to the cultural norms of the time with every YouTube video and Instagram post. I always leave room for the odd miracle, the Reagan moment, the Immaculate Reception and the Phantom Punch. But I saw and called that Barack Obama was a future Democratic Party superstar and would likely be President in 2012 I only missed by four years. Where is the person who defines your idea of what Conservatism is? Can they be elected nationally? What happens when the Latinos start to flex their muscles in state legislatures that are now still red because of the good old boy system and the dying conservative “base?” These are the questions I’d like to debate, not who killed who or fought at a party that will be forgotten to history. Where is the next great conservative presidential candidate, Bill Logan and how will you get the House and Senate back after Hillary wins in 2016?

    • Fredrick Schwartz, D.S.V.J., O.Q.H. [Journ.] Says:

      Really? The only way Hillary could possibly lose is some CREEP style Nixonian smear campaign that gains traction in the Press. The odds of that are slim because even among conservative women Hillary is more popular than Sarah Payme.

    • Fredrick Schwartz, D.S.V.J., O.Q.H. [Journ.] Says:

      Blacks out voted whites 66% to 64% in 2012. Over 11 million Latinos voted in 2012 and Romney only got 3 million of their votes or a low 27%. What candidate do you have that can close that gap? Where are those PUMAs Bill?

    • Fredrick Schwartz, D.S.V.J., O.Q.H. [Journ.] Says:

      Obama ran a better campaign and Hillary has learned from her mistakes unlike the average conservative. Had Romney been himself he might have made it closer but like McCain he was unelectable from day one.

  4. You’re on the dead side of 60 Bill. Since you jack off thinking of Christ, keep in mind he was a Jew. A dark skinned Jew. A Jew who (according to legend) was the son of god. Christians like you spew the devils vomit through your thoughts and actions. Your a fucking bigot. A racist. You think you’re better than everyone because your innate stupidity deludes you into thinking your superior. You’re defensive. You lash out but your scared mind tethers you to a paranoid living hell. Apparently you think that providing bullshit “evidence” is an ipso facto absolution of your own self righteousness and magically places you in a position to dictate absolute truth.
    It doesn’t. It only underscores what a horrifically repulsive, vile and disgusting pig of a human being you aspire to be. And you admire the worst of our evolution.
    I read a nonsensical, disjointed comment you made wherein you conflated having 4 grandsons with homosexuality. A homosexuality that you inferred was both aggressive an militant. Want to tell us more Bill? Are your grandsons tolerant Millennials who could give a shit less or are they gay?
    Or are you Bill? I mean, after all everyone here knows what gets you off.
    Do yourself a favor. Quit being a respondent on blogs. Fish. Play golf. Ride your bike with your beautiful Princess. Take a vacation to a place you’ve never been before. Write a manual on being a successful HVAC expert. Do something positive, productive and selfless before you die. Which with as much hate that resides inside of you, that you carry around and are proud of, turn it into something that will get you into the idea of Heaven that you defend so vociferously. Otherwise you won’t and your soul mates from a long ago south Asian war will be very disappointed.
    I despise you. You flayal at me but at least I make the effort to be forgiving. But in the meantime, go fuck yourself.

    • Fredrick Schwartz, D.S.V.J., O.Q.H. [Journ.] Says:

      Bill your shit is weak man.

    • Fredrick Schwartz, D.S.V.J., O.Q.H. [Journ.] Says:

      That’s funny. How exactly do you judge being a man Bill? Is it what you say or what you do? Or is it some combination of both. I’m happy and my happiness doesn’t cost you a thing. Your happiness might cost me mine if I lived in the America you lust after. How is that freedom?

  5. Fredrick Schwartz, D.S.V.J., O.Q.H. [Journ.] Says:

    And here’s a tip for you Amazona. If you think you can come here with you longwinded bullshit about “explain your political beliefs” I will only hurt your feelings once again. You have every opportunity to post here and nothing you write will ever be deleted. But I am going to take every chance I can get to twist your nipples until you come so hard you scream my name. I mean that politically, of course.

  6. Oh gee Bill. You’ve really got me now! Seem’s to me a few days ago I was part of 101 comments. Want to publicize anything about me again?? I might retaliate and talk about, oh I don’t know who. Maybe Peter. You’ve been barred from B4V because you’ve embarrassed even them. So now you are pissed and come here? Do you blame these folks for you being a fucking shit?
    You’re on the dead side of 60 Bill Logan. Dead. Side.
    Repent before it’s to late. A monotheistic God is a Jewish idea and you are no Catholic. You’re a cunt.

    • Fredrick Schwartz, D.S.V.J., O.Q.H. [Journ.] Says:

      Wow Mitch next time speak your mind dude.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: