Archive for the THE CONSIGLIERI Category


Posted in SARAH PALIN, THE CONSIGLIERI, VOX POPULI with tags , on 28/07/2014 by consigliereciucava


Variety is reporting this morning that former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin is launching her own Internet television channel called Palin claims the channel will focus on, “important issues facing the nation” stating she wants, “to talk to talk directly to you on our channel– on my terms.” Those terms it seems are $9.95 per month or an annual subscription of $99.95.

Above you can see Palin’s target audience discussing one of those issues important to the American people– immigration. There are hundreds of thousands of these bigots, conspiracy theorists and generally uninformed individuals clustered in all across America I am told by my human colleagues. The good news is that this Palin channel will become the gift that keeps on giving for Progressives as the midterm elections roll around in just over three three months.

Qu’ul cuda praedex nihil!

Ciu Cava daelth Nixhot, J.F.. D.S.V.J.
The Dis Brimstone Daily Pitchfork
33 Ashtaq 3 AS




In my travels I hear quite a bit about low information voters. There seem to be quite a bit of people who become low information voters because once the boxes that appeal to them have been ticked, they cease to listen to anything that deviates from their beliefs. This can happen on both sides of the political divide in America today. I have seen this recently, meaning over the past six years more on the Right than the Left.


A recent post at can act as a clear illustration of this premise. Sarah Palin’s facebook post about celebrating Freedom and not Government was met with harsh criticism from the Left which provoked harsh responses from the Right. As much as this was expected, I was surprised when a commenter tried to compare and contrast the stands that Palin takes vice what he feels as a conservative what Obama/Clinton stand for politically:

2016 Presidential Election

Gov. Sarah Palin:
1. conservative
2. loving God
3. loving founding fathers
4. saving unborn babies
5. supporting traditional marriage, morality, responsibility
6. defender of U.S. Constitution
7. less government control and regulations and more individual’s freedom/liberty
8. low taxes/letting people keep more of what they earned
9. energy INDEPENDENT/drilling and fracking for more gas and oil to create jobs
10. reducing debts for future generations
11. cutting irresponsible spendings
12. free market capitalism/
no crony capitalism
13. no coporate welfare/foodstamps/bailouts
14. helping the helpless, not the clueless
15. no rewarding bad behaviors
16. SAVING America from bankruptcy
17. RESTORING America’s greatness

Obama/Clinton (2 faces of the same coin):
1. liberal/progressive
2. hating God
3. hating founding fathers
4. agreeing with China on killing unborn babies
5. supporting gay/lesbian (i.e. uncle/aunt and nephew/niece, 2 brothers,
2 sisters, …), immorality, irresponsiblity
5. supporting immorality, irresponsiblity, gay/lesbian marriage between 2
individuals (i.e. a man and a woman, 2 men, 2 women, uncle/aunt and nephew/niece,
2 brothers, 2 sisters, …)
6. attacker of U.S. Constitution
7. more government control/regulations and less individual’s freedom/liberty
8. high taxes/ripping off people
9. energy dependent/man caused global warming or climate chaos
10. more debts for future generations
11. more irresponsible spendings
12. socialism/
crony capitalism
13. more coporate welfare/foodstamps/bailouts
14. getting the clueless/useful idiots become addicted to free stuffs/entitlement programs
15. rewarding bad behaviors/illegal immigrants (undocumented democrats),
DESERTER/TRAITOR Bowe Bergdahl, … etc.
17. TRANSFORMING America into some socialist utopia

For the purpose of clarity I feel it is my duty to point out the fallacies and misinformation in this list. The poster has clearly placed his/her own beliefs into what he feels a proper candidate for President should hold as values when in fact none of these are true factors in what makes someone suitable to hold the highest elected office in America. Once again, a conservative is trying to use “shaming” and the fear of ostracism by not being accepted by a group he feels is the majority to elevate an unqualified person to a state of qualification.

1. Conservative v Liberal/Progressive

Ms Palin is a conservative but in opinion she is more of TEA Party conservative than an establishment one. Ms Clinton is a pragmatist who has a more centrist political view that most political scientists would call “progressive.”

2. loving God v. hating God

I would begin with the question which God? Or even better whose God? The commenter being a conservative clearly means the Christian God as to the bulk of American conservatives this is one true god. Unfortunately for conservatives, there is no religious test for being President of the United States. Having a president that shares their religious beliefs and values might give those voters on the right a warm fuzzy but it isn’t a constitutional requirement. Equally, I see no proof from Ms Clinton’s actions as Secretary of State that she hates the Christian God or that President Obama hates the Christian God. These people are politicians not students at a theological school running for recording secretary. Religion does not matter in this debate because people can have no religion and be ethical moral people and people who wear their religion on their chests can act in terribly immoral and unethical ways.

3. Loving the founding fathers v hating the founding fathers.

I have a very big problem with the use of the word hate here but it does serve a purpose. The reference to the founding fathers of America is a dog whistle of code of white male conservatives. It means Hillary is bringing feminine power that will make white conservative men obeisant to her authority; an authority that terrifies men who have had it their way since the signing of the Declaration of Independence. Second it is more code to the disrespect white conservative men feel at having to acknowledge a person of color as their Chief Executive. As much as it causes eye rolling on the Right the bigotry on the Right regarding America’s first black president has been a torrent of disrespect as has never been seen in American politics. Of course, to say this it becomes clear that Palin as a candidate will bow to male hegemony and respect and protect white male conservative unearned privilege.

4. saving unborn babies v agreeing with China on killing unborn babies

As I have written many times the abortion debate is less about sex and more about demographics. For decades the fear that their would become a balance between the majority white American population and the minority population has fueled the anti-abortion movement. Sure there are a small percentage of people from the minority camp that see this as a moral issue but the bulk of the anti-abortion power brokers are in this fight not for God but for votes. If the numbers of white women in the south and Midwest having abortions dwindled to near zero many of the people who pour billions into the anti-abortion crusade would spent their political capital elsewhere. It really doesn’t matter what a President palin thinks about unborn babies what really matters is that Roe v Wade is settled case law.

5. Supporting traditional marriage, morality and responsibility v supporting gay/lesbian (i.e. uncle/aunt and nephew/niece, 2 brothers,
2 sisters, …), immorality, irresponsiblity [sic] supporting immorality, irresponsiblity [sic], gay/lesbian marriage between 2 individuals (i.e. a man and a woman, 2 men, 2 women, uncle/aunt and nephew/niece, 2 brothers, 2 sisters, …)

Since I don’t have the time nor the desire to write a multichapter several hundred page work of non fiction on this topic I will distill my comments to a few sentences. Traditional marriage one hundred years ago, in 1914, meant in several states that only a man and a woman of the same race could marry and that the woman had no property rights within that marriage. Just over fifty years later traditional marriage had changed to allow men and women of different races to marry, something that would have caused a firestorm of controversy in 1914 much like the controversy in America surrounding same sex marriage in 2014. The comment attempts, poorly, to conflate two men or two women marrying with incest which is illegal in every state in the Union. Despite a federal ruling, 12 states still have anti-sodomy laws on the books making sex between those of the same gender illegal and oral and anal sex among married couples illegal as well. I don’t know of a single advocate for same sex marriage who wants siblings to be able to marry each other or parents to be able to marry children. This line of thinking is horribly fallacious.

6. Defender of the Constitution v attacker of the COnstitution

Yet another code word canard for “in support of white privilege v attacker of white privilege.”

7. less government control and regulations and more individual’s freedom/liberty v more government control/regulations and less individual’s freedom/liberty

There is little Sarah Palin can do to make America more individually free. In reality one of the things conservatives understand the least is that of the rules one has to follow on a daily basis in America local and state laws come into play far more than federal regulations. I believe this commenter is making an appeal here against ObamaCare, poorly, and a veiled reference to Progressives wanting to take guns away from the American people.

8. low taxes/letting people keep more of what they earned v high taxes/ripping off people

I have always liked the argument of allowing people who want to pay no taxes to have to put a coin in their toilet to flush it each time and then see how they feel about taxation. None of these conservatives seem to be able to twig to the notion that it isn’t the taxes it’s the wages. Raise the minimum wage to $15 an hour and one would see a renaissance in the American economy that might hold until the early decades of the 22nd century according to our lead economist Carlton Pryor. The only people being ripped off in America are those who have lost middle class status, the truly disabled and those working 40 hours a week for minimum wage being called “moochers” by the Right.

9. energy INDEPENDENT/drilling and fracking for more gas and oil to create jobs v energy dependent/man caused global warming or climate chaos

There is a cancer in the minds of conservatives that America would be energy independent if they could just control two branches of the government. That is one of the greatest economic and political lies ever told. Conservatives like the commenter still believe that if America drills for its own oil they could produce the 22 million bbl a day they need to keep the freedom of cars and personal transportation which is at the heart of their belief about freedom. Many petroleum scientists feel that close to half of the oil in the ground on Terra has been removed. The Rham Institute for Resource Studies estimates that by 2020 45% of the oil will have been pumped and by 2050 that number will be 55%. It would seem prident that in the coming decades America would want to keep some of its own oil in the ground. However, the drilling on government land, in Alasaka’s ANWR would not result in lower prices because the market sets the price based on supply. Over supply by America would be met with reduced production by OPEC. According to an April 2014 report of American oil resources 43% of oil was locked in federal lands and the total oil reserves on and offshore were 67.41 billion bbl. At current usage rates this would last 8.7 years. I’m agnostic on global warming or climate change; I’ll leave that debate to climate scientists.

10. reducing debts for future generations v more debts for future generations

Where were these cries during the Reagan and Bush II years?

11. cutting irresponsible spendings [sic] v more irresponsible spendings [sic]

I don’t know what irresponsible spending Obama has done that has harmed the US economy. Palin has had no experience since resigning as Alaska Governor so she doesn’t have any federal budgetary experience. Per Carlton Pryor, Lead Economist TED-OG, “[She] was a supporter of the war in Iraq which was a waste of $3 trillion which would have nearly fully reversed the Great Recession by paying $32,000 to every working American over the age of 16. This would have been a more prudent measure had the Great Recession been properly foreseen.”

12. free market capitalism/no crony capitalism v socialism

This is another red herring. America is a curious economic admixture of socialism [Social Security, Medicaid] and capitalism [tax breaks for oil companies and off shore accounts for corporate persons]. I can only imagine this is a feaful swipe at Obama/Clinton and knowing that if HRC is elected single payer will come to pass by the end of her first term.

13. no coporate [sic] welfare/foodstamps/bailouts v more coporate [sic] welfare/foodstamps/bailouts

Where do I begin? This seems to go against the religious ethic of helping the poor, but that would be a facile digression. Once again, Carlton Pryor, “The bank bailout, done during the Bush II administration was a necessary first step toward pushing back from the precipice of Depression. Had this and the Stimulus not been done we would not be having this conversation but rather a conversation about whether America would recover economically in time to save itself as a nation. Now with the American economy finally healing a 2016 election of Ms Palin and retrograde economists that would advise her would be to run headlong toward that cliff and leap, on faith, to demise.”

14. helping the helpless, not the clueless v getting the clueless/useful idiots become addicted to free stuffs/entitlement programs

Well I would imagine this commenter want President Palin to do away with Social Security, which is an entitlement program and allow millions of Baby Boomers to be reduced to eating pet food or starving to death in the streets. This isn’t hyperbole, this is what would happen under this sort of draconian economic policy.

15. no rewarding bad behaviors v rewarding bad behaviors/illegal immigrants (undocumented democrats), DESERTER/TRAITOR Bowe Bergdahl, … etc.

Bad behaviors are most often not rewarded in America. Counties, cities and states all have laws to punish criminals. On the immigration front I stand on the fact that what made America great were the immigrants who to this day provide the diversity needed to maintain a powerful democracy. Bergdahl? I’ll leave that to the Judge Advocate General to investigate his status and whether a Court Martial is required.

16. Saving America from bankruptcy v Bankrupting America

I honestly don’ t know what Palin can do, without a cooperative Congress, from 2017 until 2021 to save America from bankruptcy. If anything her administration’s potential policies will send America into that abyss.

17. Restoring America’s greatness v TRANSFORMING America into some socialist utopia

Did you hear the dog whistle? More need for male white privilege to keep “the Other” from taking their share of the American Dream.

Qu’ul cuda praedex nihil!

Ciu Cava daelth Nixhot, J.F.. D.S.V.J.
The Dis Brimstone Daily Pitchfork
12 Ashtaq 3 AS




Conservatives, suddenly, care about black babies, but only those that are in the womb.

ObamaCare navigators are terrorists.

To Conservatives, Liberals are perverts.

The far Right turns its wrath on former conservative superstar Jan Brewer.

Ciu Cava daelth Nixhot, J.F.. D.S.V.J.
The Dis Brimstone Daily Pitchfork
132 1 Leviathan 3 AS




I must say my admiration of the President of the United States grows by the day. President Barack Obama, a true Human Being, is made of far more stern stuff than I. The vile comments, the unbridled hatred and the foul mouth bigotry that is spewed at him on the Internet every day would be enough to wear down any lesser being. Speaking only for myself and not for my entire species I know that I would crumble under just a few days of the pressure that he swims in with grace and intellect 24 hours a day seven days a week.

The conservative bigots at Breitbart however see America and Terra quite differently. The long for the days when America [read white men} controlled the world. I would be the first to admit the words of John Fitzgerald Kennedy ring loud and true today in America as compared to when the average TEA Partier was 20 years old, “The world is very different now.” Back in that time the mid 1970s some social change had been made but as Reagan entered office in 1981 there was a collective sigh of relief on the Right. The times were still economically tough, but Democrats in the Congress worked with Reagan to pull America out of the economic mess of the post Nixon, Ford, and Carter administrations. No such thing has happened during Obama’s tenure in the White House. The GOP, hijacked by the TEA Party has become an Enemy of the White House as they are allied against the President on every several issue.

The reason for this is that the far Right feels that the loud voices who call for America to “go back to the Constitution” were put off by both Romney and before him McCain. What is really true is the GOP is no longer a viable national party because a full third of them, those with TEA Party/Koch Brothers alliances have to cater to a rabid minority of 25 million voters who believe thing like you will see below which are comments made at to a post made by Robert Wilde about the Obamas not attending church on 25 December 2013 while on vacation in Hawaii:

George Clark what_what_what • 12 hours ago
Reagan didn’t go to church, after getting elected, because of the burden it would have put upon the parishioners, with all the Secret Service agents, etc. At least that was the reason he gave. No one ought to be holding Obama to a higher standard, agreed. Old Scratch, though, doesn’t seem to mind shutting down an entire restaurant so he can eat a hamburger while all other patrons do without while he chows down–he could easily invite the chefs to prepare his burger at the White House, couldn’t he, and spare the other patrons the inconvenience? I don’t remember Reagan holding Waffle House hostage so he could belly up to a good pancake breakfast. I’m sure Barry would happily shut down an entire megachurch for Christmas prayer for himself and his nappy little brood if it gave a good photo-op for him. Reagan, like Obama, was the king of staged photo-ops. Remember that hilarious one where the Secret Service staged an assassination attempt on Reagan to boost his popularity in the polls? Obama ought to try that one, what with his poll numbers sinking to Nixonian levels and lower.

Cobra212 Edlhackney • 5 hours ago
It becomes our business when a candidate for President presents himself as a practicing Christian, continues to present himself as having Christian beliefs, while behind the scenes is something totally different. As President, his beliefs are our business when we as voters are making a decision about who we want to lead this country. When that person lies to us for the sole purpose of deceiving us into believing he is something he isn’t just to get elected, then we should all be concerned.

Ronald B. Stetton joeschmo8675309 • 12 hours ago −
The “majority that voted,” voted against God. What has happened since is just noise. The Muslim took the popular vote in 2008. Whatever has happened since is deception. We have seen our last freely-elected President.
It’s over…

flahorsedentist Ronald B. Stetton • 6 hours ago −
My daughter has a good friend who is Jewish Iranian. Her grandmother (who fled Iran after the shah was deposed) says Obama speaks and acts like a Muslim. She says this about all things Obama. She also is adamant about anyone with a name Hussein is Muslim period.

woodsman1st joeschmo8675309 • 5 hours ago −
The only “shovel ready jobs” we can ever expect from obama will be to bury our dead that he personally murdered with his DEATH PANELS AND HIS OBAMACARE.
Obama is well on the way to becoming a mass murderer as bad as any in the entire history of the world.

Mark McIntyre Ronald B. Stetton • 3 hours ago −
Obama is a muslim pig, and should be hung for treason. He is a bastard

George Clark rm56 • 10 hours ago −
I’ve been reading some of your insightful and grammatically correct posts, buckwheat:

“Oh yes, and I hope all the people out of work and all the people who lost their insurance vote conservative!”

What’s your point? We long ago stopped locking up mental defectives like yourself, Elmer–maybe we ought to start doing it again? I’ve heard that Obamacare has a lot of provisions for mandatory mental health care for waterheads like yourself. I have a cousin who works for the government, and he’s shown me some of the new rules for commitment. One of them is that if the subject has an atavistic fear of using proper grammar, such as apostrophes and commas, he is going to be locked up. A sure sign of mental illness, according to the new Obamacare rules. They will be coming after you soon, Elmer. My advice to you is to stop posting. Every grammatically incorrect sentence that you post is just more evidence needed for Obama and his boys to lock you up. As a conservative, I very much wish that you can just be safe in your mentally defective way, and keep hanging out in the library and such, and taking your methadone and all. But Obama is coming after you, man. Eric Holder is going to lock you up for being mentally defective. Just trying to watch out for a poor soul, that’s all. Take care, man, and when The Real Man knocks on your door, head out the fire escape.

JR1984 • 16 hours ago
Obummer got reelected, why does he need to go to church now. He paid his dues to Reverend Wright and made a whole lot of low information voters think he cared. He did not and does not.
Communist do not like religion as they want people to believe in the government and that all things come from the government. To believe in GOD means the people believe in a higher power, and we know Obummer thinks he is a God and there is no higher power. On Judgment Day he is in for a RUDE surprise.

David Epperson • 16 hours ago
Most churchs in Hawaii have pews below Moochelle weight limit.

lemonlime St Marc • 14 hours ago
So, you also think it would be wrong to judge someone like Hitler, too? Note to the faux St. Marc………..most of us are not southern, and we call it like it is. The only “hate” is what Obama has directed to the U.S. population and especially our troops.

George Clark St Marc • 10 hours ago
You cast the first stone, buckwheat. I despise hypocrites. I guess that there are more good Christians in the North? Are they hypocrites like yourself, who throw stones? You aren’t a Christian, you make me sick.

“Mucho Christians inda SOUTH…”

Also, you should have paid attention to your third grade teacher when s/he was teaching grammar, buckwheat.

gcunning • 16 hours ago
All aspects of my life revolve around my faith and I despise O more than most but this is a non-story. I don’t care if he goes to a building to worship Christ….but I’ve never believed his life was centered around Christianity in anyway, one can’t do what he’s done and claim to be a practicing Christain….color me not affected by O’s lack of Christian faith.

pnipni • 14 hours ago
…because he’s pretending to be Christian when we all know that he receives daily texts from his Imam. He’s some kind of Muslim.
As a side note, the news states that he’s being advised by SIX muslim Brotherhood members. . Do we need to know any more about this IMPOSTER and TRAITOR.

Media outlest including Fox News reported the Obama family spent part of the holiday at Marine Corps Base Hawaii.

Qu’ul cuda praedex nihil!

Ciu Cava daelth Nixhot, J.F.. D.S.V.J.
The Dis Brimstone Daily Pitchfork
74 1 Leviathan 2 AS




The MSM has made quite a bit out of Duck Dynasty patriarch Phil Robertson’s comments about homosexuality. I am one of the few here at The Dis Brimstone-Daily Pitchfork that is not a journalist. I am a practitioner of the law here in Hell’s capital Dis. To me, the issue swirling around A&E and their reality star is not a matter of 1st amendment rights at all; it is a matter of how much one is willing to sacrifice to hold on to their personal beliefs.

The right to free speech is codified, federally, in the 1st amendment to the United States Constitution as:

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.”

Clearly, this is not a de facto or de jure allowance of all speech. The 1st amendment begins with the words, “Congress shall make no law . . .” and it continues to state that the body of people who represent the American eligible voters and their minor offspring will not establish a state religion, nor shall they prohibit the free exercise of religion or prohibit free speech or governmental interference in the Free Press. So to inject more clarity, had Congress passed a law stating that Phil Robertson or anyone can no longer express their religion based beliefs in public, or on the airwaves, this would have been a violation of the 1st amendment. The simple fact that his comments or some of the ones below from Neocon1 of Blogs for Victory infamy have caused the ire of Progressives, Moderates and Conservatives alike have little to do with 1st amendment and more to do with how society feels today in 2013 about bigoted speech.

I feel that the words of Phil Robertson were a stentorian shout of bigotry based in biblical beliefs. Robertson has a right to express these beliefs but what he doesn’t have is the right to bear no consequences economically for expressing them. One must keep in mind that America is far from being a democracy. The United States is a corporate oligarchy, and quite a complex one, married with a representative constitutional republic. Corporations gain far more from the federal government than individuals do, however, the system still would work on behalf of the individual or in the case of the LGBT community if their interests mesh with those of corporate powers.

That said I come to Neocon1 who has said many bigoted things in the past and seems to relish the fact that his comments make Progressives and others angry. For years the moderators at Blogs4Victory have simply gone along with this man’s rants and ravings which are regularly anti-black, anti-LGBT and anti-Obama. He has a right to do this and has been allowed by the moderators to do so until most recently when they responded to an anti-LGBT rant in this manner:

Neocon1: I guess quotes from the Catholic church and it’s saints over the years fails the homosexual PC test. very sad.

You seem to be saying that moderators are homosexuals defending a PC position. Not so. But your constant ranting about homosexuality and your constant efforts to justify your rants have resulted in having all of them removed. And they will be continued to be removed no matter how many Catholics you quote. Enough on this subject. No more homosexual rants, no more white hut rants, no more Kenyan rants. Be sad but enough is enough. //Moderator

While the B4V comments were removed some of his comments at one of his favorite haunts The Blaze have been archived and follow:

neocon1Jun. 20, 2013 at 4:31pm
this was a cherry picked case by left wing S**Tcago racist mobs to over turn the stand your ground laws in Fla.
It all falls into his insane destruction of the 2nd amendment in order to usher in his marxist/muslim paradise.
Make NO mistake about it our GOP governor scott FOLDED like a piece of tissue paper when confronted by lunatic blacks marching, beating, looting, murdering threatening all in the name of “justice” for a doper, thieving, fist fighting thug, named NO_LIMIT_NI^^AH.

Hope ole George likes being in jail with the rest of the DEMOCRAT blacks who hate white (hispanics)

One can read the pattern of bigotry and his hatred for blacks at The Blaze and while William J Logan aka Neocon1 isn’t a public figure on television, like Robertson he is a businessman. The Moderator has finally put his foot down at B4V with:

This is a pattern of yours. You obsess about something and post about it over and over again, you get deeper and deeper into your obsession, and when you get called on it you act innocent and hurt. You know what you do and you know you like to push things as far as you can. You have made your point plenty of times and have crossed the line from just reposting things of interest into selecting things that support your personal prejudice and hammering the topic incessantly. You know what “enough” means and whining about being called on your efforts to see how far you can go with your posts will end up getting all of your posts removed. // Moderator

Maybe Mr Logan will learn his lesson and decide a blog is not the best place to vent his spleen about those to whom he bears prejudice and anger. It would be terrible to think however that a man with such beliefs would find a forum for such retrograde ideas but to express is and always will be his right.

Qu’ul cuda praedex nihil!

Ciu Cava daelth Nixhot, J.F.. D.S.V.J.
The Dis Brimstone Daily Pitchfork
68 1 Leviathan 2 AS


Posted in THE CONSIGLIERI, VOX POPULI with tags , on 07/10/2013 by consigliereciucava


As the new media becomes the established media over the next few decades in America the medium is becoming the message. Ben Shapiro of infamy has launched whose mission is summed up with:

The media win elections for the left. It’s not the left’s competence in office; leftists have demonstrated none. It’s not the left’s ideas; leftist ideas have failed everywhere they have been tried. The left wins for one simple reason: leftists control the information distribution system in the United States. And they use that system to pillory conservatives heartless bigots intent on harming the poor and targeting minorities.

The media must be destroyed where they stand. That is our mission at Truth Revolt. The goal of TruthRevolt is simple: unmask leftists in the media for who they are, destroy their credibility with the American public, and devastate their funding bases.

TruthRevolt focuses on high-profile media members, and holding them accountable. But TruthRevolt does not stop there. TruthRevolt understands that all politics is local, and therefore looks to fight leftist propaganda at the local level, monitoring local newspapers, television and radio. TruthRevolt also seeks to stop the left dead in its tracks when it comes to training the next generation, our college campuses.

TruthRevolt works to make advertisers and funders aware of the leftist propaganda they sponsor – and bringing social consequences to bear to create pressure on such advertisers and funders.

This will get personal. This will get rough. We’re ready for action.

We need your help, and we want you to get involved — not just by giving money, but by becoming a TruthRevolt fighter. See our “Join the Fight” page to learn how you can help.

I find this an interesting mission statement and have offered it to the rest of the editorial writers here to comment upon today.

Qu’ul cuda praedex nihil!

Ciu Cava daelth Nixhot, J.F.. D.S.V.J.
The Dis Brimstone Daily Pitchfork
141 Colnu 2 AS


Posted in CONSERVATIVE OBSESSION WITH SEX, FOX NEWS, HOWARD KURTZ, THE CONSIGLIERI with tags on 29/08/2013 by consigliereciucava


To anyone working in journalism here in Hell the name Ben Bradlee is revered. As historical figures go Benjamin Crowninshield Bradlee could have done anything he wanted with his life. He served in the Pacific during WWII in the United States Navy as an intelligence officer. Her returned home and poured himself into journalism. If you recall he was portrayed by Jason Robards in the motion picture All The President’s Men.

Ben Bradlee turned 92 on Monday of this week and on a personal note I wish him many many more happy birthdays. Now to the more odious reason of my post today as consiglieri of this newspaper. On that day, Howard Kurtz who now works for Fox News after a stint at CNN, wrote this article about Bradlee’s daughter in law Pari Bradelee. The article is almost nonsense and it is definitely not news. Kurtz seems to have settled into the other side of the Fox News de rigueur of oftentimes thinking that anything that comes to mind, especially if it has a titillating aspect, is worthy of a column.

Pari Bradlee

The article makes one think before delving into who Pari Bradlee is that she had been photographed naked, or nearly naked as if there would have been something inherently wrong about that. There is a quite elegant, feminine and artistic photo of Pari looking confident and stunning on her Facebook page that seems to have become a brainworm in Kurtz’s mind. Then the article becomes really bizarre. Kurtz informs his readers, “In another just-posted photo she is nude, shot from the back, twisting one arm behind her.” Then he asks his audience, “Do the pictures go too far?” I find it difficult to cough up enough petals to even offer that question a reply.

pari bradlee 2

The quote explaining the photo that is offered by Howard Kurtz is done in a style that would have a freshman journalism professor wincing and reaching for his red marker:

“I have worked so hard all my life and always wanted to feel and be beautiful inside and out,” Bradlee writes on Facebook. “I own my sensuality and teach others not to repress it. Femininity for me is a very powerful and beautiful force.” She says the bra, which looks like someone took a scissors to it, was suggested by “my beautiful Persian QUEEN Maryam Amirimaidi” and that her mother-in-law, Sally Quinn, “bought me those Louboutins” — the only other thing she is wearing.

The actual quote from Ms Bradlee is:

This is a very special photo for me for various reasons: It’s in a room that I’ve always dreamed of, one of my dearest friends took it and made me laugh so much I was sore! I have worked so hard all of my life and always wanted to feel and be beautiful inside and out. I own my sensuality and teach others to not repress it. Femininity for me is a very powerful and beautiful force. The bra was suggested my my beautiful Persian QUEEN Maryam Amirmajdi in her store Jaryam. I would have never picked that out. She said it was made for me as well as the shrug. Sally bought me those Louboutins.
I’ve always wanted a picture like that. Barry gave me one of the best gifts I’ve ever received. I will treasure it forever.
It’s a symbol of overcoming being bullied and told that I would never make it in life. A poor girl from the hood that could never afford nice things and take care of herself. A symbol of overcoming pain in general and showing all beings in the world that you can be who you wish to be no matter what.

Very strong words from a strong and beautiful woman versus the a writer who has taken the low road and by doing so damaged his journalistic reputation for no reason at all. Kurtz even got wrong that Ms Bradlee was wearing something other than a bra. It is my opinion that Howard Kurtz is one of those types of people that are bullies that Pari mentions. The scandal here is not the art and beauty of the human form but why Howard Kurtz felt he could throw such feces on the wall of the Internet and no one would call him out. Were it possible for me to travel to Terra, and seeing that Pari Bradlee is fond of cigars I would enjoy sitting somewhere quietly with her, and her husband of course, and enjoying a nice Cuban Presidente. Of course, this too would outrage Howard Kurtz and his loyal readers!

Qu’ul cuda praedex nihil!

Ciu Cava daelth Nixhot, J.F.. D.S.V.J.
The Dis Brimstone Daily Pitchfork
104 Colnu 2 AS

%d bloggers like this: